Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 24th May 2009 12:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 365241
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-07-13
-Ad
If only they would make them jury trials.
However, I think that is the last thing that the prosecuting party wants. I don't think many juries would convict (unless the person was infringing copyright for profit on an industrial scale).
Plus the copyright laws may be a bit abstract for many jurors to follow. Even more important, jury trials are relatively slow and expensive so I think they are reserved for the most important cases rather than less important disputes.