Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th May 2009 12:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 365468
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Monopoly.
What does it have to do with monopoly? any organisation can go out use one of the many third parties that provide such services; code signing simply tells you that the driver is written by the company who they say they are - that the Intel driver you are about to install is actually written by Intel and signed by Intel to say so.
I don't know why you claim 'monopoly' when you have the necessary stuff provided by a a third party - thus it isn't Microsoft leveraging their monopoly; heck, right now pretty much all software companies are signing their software.