Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th May 2009 20:56 UTC
Mac OS X Getting Mac OS X up and running on a computer without an Apple label has always been a bit of a hassle. You needed customised Mac OS X disks, updates would ruin all your hard work, and there was lots of fiddling with EFI and the likes. Ever since the release of boot-132, this is no longer the case. Read on for how setting up a "Hack"intosh really is as easy as 1, 3, 2.
Thread beginning with comment 365557
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: No HT?
by poundsmack on Tue 26th May 2009 22:26 UTC in reply to "No HT?"
Member since:

OSX can utilize HyperThreading. After all, when Steve Jobs first told the world that Apple had been cooking up OSX on x86 boxes for a while the minimus sys requirements was a P4 with HT (since those were what the development boxes Apple had used). For more on HyperThreading as it aplies now see here:,1947-5.html

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: No HT?
by Theodric on Tue 26th May 2009 22:44 in reply to "RE: No HT?"
Theodric Member since:

I can confirm that HT works under OSX, on *an* Atom (N230) because that's what lives in my OSX-enabled Mini 9 netbook, a boot-132 vanilla install, and HT is running fine. It's more probable that there's some issue with both HT and dualcore + Atom, since the 330 has both of those features (check if you don't believe me), although I will note that the new Nehalem-based Mac Pros utilise HT to deliver 8- or 16-thread capability on single- and dual-quadcore systems.

It's a common issue with osx86 to have to set cpus=1 under certain chipsets/procs, so I'm guessing that OSX's SMP implementation simply isn't as universal as, say, Linux or Windows. And why would it have to be? After all, it only needs to run on Macs ;)

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: No HT?
by Thom_Holwerda on Tue 26th May 2009 22:50 in reply to "RE[2]: No HT?"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:

Yes, you're right. I need to change the article to say HT on the Atom 330 *specifically* isn't supported (yet?).

Good catch, guys. Fixing.

Reply Parent Score: 1