Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th May 2009 20:56 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 365618
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Sweet Thom is giving hardware ...
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 27th May 2009 08:46
in reply to "RE[2]: Sweet Thom is giving hardware ..."
You're totally right of course, and I'm not saying this machine is somehow a good Mac Mini alternative. This is just an experiment to show how easy it is to make your own Mac. I chose to build an Atom machine because 1) dual-core Atom 330 is rare and teh awesome, 2) it's cheap.
Also note that the Mac Mini probably draws a buttload more power.
RE[4]: Sweet Thom is giving hardware ...
by Tom K on Wed 27th May 2009 17:21
in reply to "RE[3]: Sweet Thom is giving hardware ..."




Member since:
2007-07-27
a current mac mini will totally destroy thoms machine. an single atom roughly compares to an g4 running at 2/3 the ghz. his double core 1,6 ghz atom with a lousy gma 950 and without hyperthreading will be somewhere between the last g4 minis and the first single core intel minis. and the used price of this macs (see: www.mac2sell.net) is comparable to what he paid for his new pc. i still feel tempted to use this to replace my loud emac, but it's not that obvious that it's the best alternative for a small, cheap, silent not-so-powerful mac:
+ you can use a 3,5 '' harddisk which will be much faster and cheaper than the 2,5 '' used in the mac mini
- sleep doesn't work
- you'll have to reinstall drivers after every update
Edited 2009-05-27 08:36 UTC