Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th May 2009 14:23 UTC, submitted by hotice
Thread beginning with comment 365926
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
Why?
Applications for GNOME very often include a "g" in their name.
Applications for Mac very often includ a "i" in their name.
Why are these not likewise "tired"?
On the KDE menus, applications are grouped into application categories and named after their function. The "k" in the application's name (only for some of the applications, BTW) is barely noticeable.
Examples:
http://lancelot.fomentgroup.org/images/screenshots/lancelot1.7-air....
http://lancelot.fomentgroup.org/screenshots
Amarok and Kontact application names appear on those menus, but the most visible text in the menu entries for those applications is "Audio Player" and "Personal Infromation Manager" respectively.
This is far better than on Windows where one finds applications typically grouped on the menus according to the vendor's name. One is expected to just know that the PDF viewer is produced by Adobe.
Edited 2009-05-29 01:06 UTC