Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Sep 2005 13:44 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 36608
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
that is useful to anyone but a systems administrator or a 'I open one UNIX application fullscreen and leave it open for months at a time' workstation user, they feel that there is no place for such devices?
Please. Apple got my money because they know that the 'Personal' is the 'Personal Computer'. I use it to write software, play music, record music, create 2D and 3D artwork, play games, surf the web, read email and occasionally use an office suite to read or write a document. I also use Linux machines to do many of the same tasks along with my 'propellerhead' work stuff.
The usage model that Schwartz seems to think is the norm is totally backwards from this. Schwartz etc. seem to think that people who buy PCs are mindless automatons without a single ounce of creativity, ambition or curiosity in their bodies, who just want to process messages sent to them by their superiors and churn out word processing documents ad nauseum.
Maybe thats true for some people who are desperately dependent on some kind of corporate rat-race to live, but it sure as hell isn't true for me.