Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 30th May 2009 19:17 UTC
Law and Order Even though we make fun of Wikipedia, and even though any serious scientific piece shouldn't cite Wikipedia, fact remains that the community-created and maintained encyclopaedia has turned into an impressive database of knowledge. Even though I don't think you should trust it blindly, it's usually an excellent starting point for information, especially when used in a casual setting. Still, its open nature is also a threat to Wikipedia, this week exemplified by the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee banning Scientology from editing Wikipedia pages.
Thread beginning with comment 366220
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Misleading
by dwayneh on Sun 31st May 2009 01:18 UTC
dwayneh
Member since:
2007-05-09

This is a misleading headline. Scientology hasn't been banned from the site. Anyone (including members of the church; at home, not at church computers) can still write whatever they want about Scientology. It's only the church computers themselves that are banned. I know the article is pretty clear on this, but anyone reading the headline might think otherwise.

RE: Misleading
by nillawafer on Sun 31st May 2009 17:02 in reply to "Misleading"
nillawafer Member since:
2007-01-10

I agree. Seeing that it is only the church's computers that have been banned, a more appropriate and less misleading title would've been something similar to "Church of Scientology Banned from Wikipedia".

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1