Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th Jul 2005 14:00 UTC, submitted by Timothy R. Butler
GNU, GPL, Open Source Tim Butler knew when he mentioned something negative about the GNU Project's General Public License (GPL), in his column on KDE last week, he would inevitably be accused of arguing the GPL was a bad license. What did not fit into that piece shall now be dealt with: is the GPL a bad license or is the issue he complained about something else?
Thread beginning with comment 3664
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: totally unrealistic
by tbutler on Wed 13th Jul 2005 16:45 UTC in reply to "totally unrealistic"
Member since:

No, I wouldn't suggest that should be done in a year. I'd delay KDE 4 until it could be done, and concentrate on a ABI compatible (KDE 3) tree until such time as a shift could be made.

(In the interest of making GNU/Linux a better desktop platform, it is preferable that ABI incompatible releases of KDE *and* GNOME are much farther apart then even they are now, in my estimation...)

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: totally unrealistic
by youknowmewell on Wed 13th Jul 2005 16:56 in reply to "RE: totally unrealistic"
youknowmewell Member since:

We could go to the extreme and do as Windows does and maintain compatibility for 15 years, how about that? Problems arrive when we are bogged down by legacy code. "Release early, release often" is the name of the game, the point is to get new things out there faster so that more people can use it so that bugs get found and squashed faster so that the new things become better faster. People complain about bloat, imagine the bloat from the legacy code from 15 years ago! No thanks, rapid-release is for me. Get rid of the old, redundant, code please. I think what both KDE and GNOME are doing regarding ABI compatibility is pretty reasonable.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: totally unrealistic
by anda_skoa on Wed 13th Jul 2005 17:00 in reply to "RE: totally unrealistic"
anda_skoa Member since:

It is a totally hypothetical thing anyway.

Such a change would require a development team interested in making this happen additionally to the one working on KDE itself.

My estimation is that there are not enough developers out there that want to compete with Trolltech's team without knowing if your work will be used at all.

They would have to deliver a solution at least as good as Qt and equal further development efforts before the KDE developer team would be even discussing it as an alternative.

Reply Parent Score: 1