Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 3rd Jun 2009 11:21 UTC, submitted by Hakime
Thread beginning with comment 366785
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: root required for installation is a problem?
by ariya on Wed 3rd Jun 2009 13:31
in reply to "root required for installation is a problem?"
RE: root required for installation is a problem?
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Thu 4th Jun 2009 02:15
in reply to "root required for installation is a problem?"
RE: root required for installation is a problem?
by MatzeB on Thu 4th Jun 2009 07:26
in reply to "root required for installation is a problem?"




Member since:
2006-08-12
Each time I read about Chrome developers saying bad things about development on Linux, I just laugh. That wiki page says root installation is not good option, what a joke
Do Chrome developers, expects to do the same crap they do on Windows, to install a binary on %LOCAL_APP_DATA% for each user????? do they understand the name says DATA!!!!! not programs, what they will do next time MS enforce better security policies and do not allow executable on Data directories, scream monopoly and that they are attacking Google, follow the good practices for the platform you are developing, for Linux, create a deb and an rpm and create a apt/yum repo like Adobe do for flash, use the system updater instead of the internal one on chrome