Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 1st Jun 2009 17:50 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 366965
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[11]: Open Solaris is not bad
by akrosdbay on Thu 4th Jun 2009 08:56
in reply to "RE[10]: Open Solaris is not bad"
Dude first off I said FEDORA 11 (Go back and look at my posts! Read, read!)
Like I said post evidence of you claim..
From cold boot to sending an email and shutting down in less than 40 seconds. Back up your claim.
I don't care which version of fedora you run.
Like you said it takes 40 seconds to boot Open Solaris, in that time I could of booted my Fedora machine, logged in, sent an email and started shutting down with the new boot scripting Fedora has added.
As a reminder this is your claim copy pasted verbatim from your earlier post.
Show clear evidence, including hardware specs of your setup. You have to login to the graphical user interface to send the email.
Edited 2009-06-04 09:01 UTC






Member since:
2005-11-10
Dude first off I said FEDORA 11 (Go back and look at my posts! Read, read!)
Dude you are not making any sense at this point. You pulled out BOOT TIMES, You can't compare boot times of an OS in a virtual machine to that of one installed directly on hardware!
You are talking in circles. Have a good night.
Edited 2009-06-04 08:38 UTC