Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 3rd Jun 2009 19:51 UTC, submitted by Kaj de Vos
Syllable, AtheOS

Kristian Van Der Vliet has implemented asynchronous input/output. This has been tested with QEmu, which shows increased performance both due to this and the also new implementation of memory-mapped files. A development build with async I/O is already available.

Thread beginning with comment 366997
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Vanders
Member since:
2005-07-06

I've always disliked bounties. I'd prefer people contribute because they want to, not because there might be money in it.

I also have concerns that any work that is contributed under a bounty may prove difficult to maintain once the original developer has collected the money: maintaining stuff as Syllable grows is already a problem due to the sheer amount of work involved.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Mark Williamson Member since:
2005-07-06

I've always disliked bounties. I'd prefer people contribute because they want to, not because there might be money in it.


I'd say bounties are potentially good for when people want to contribute but need a little bit of external motivation (or they need a justification for spending time on it that could be used on non-hobby stuff, perhaps). Still I think you make a good point ...


I also have concerns that any work that is contributed under a bounty may prove difficult to maintain once the original developer has collected the money: maintaining stuff as Syllable grows is already a problem due to the sheer amount of work involved.


... particularly here! OSS really works when developers maintain their code - a code-drop-and-run policy isn't going to help anyone very much and it would seem that a bounty system might encourage this.

It still perhaps might be nice to have some suggested projects for different parts of the system, though? I had a poke around in the Syllable Kernel code ages ago and remember it being fairly tractable to understand - then I got distracted.

I occasionally wonder if I ought to revisit this; it seems like it would be easier to "make a difference" in contributing to Syllable than to contribute to Linux which already has squillions of hackers doing stuff.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Vanders Member since:
2005-07-06

It still perhaps might be nice to have some suggested projects for different parts of the system, though?


We'll have a short ToDo list up soon, and of course the bugs always need fixing!

We did also try a "Project of the Month" last year, which has turned into the Project of the Year when interest dropped off quickly.

I occasionally wonder if I ought to revisit this; it seems like it would be easier to "make a difference" in contributing to Syllable than to contribute to Linux which already has squillions of hackers doing stuff.


You'd be more than welcome, certainly!

Reply Parent Score: 2

kaiwai Member since:
2005-07-06

I've always disliked bounties. I'd prefer people contribute because they want to, not because there might be money in it.

I also have concerns that any work that is contributed under a bounty may prove difficult to maintain once the original developer has collected the money: maintaining stuff as Syllable grows is already a problem due to the sheer amount of work involved.


Good point - hence my concern when they do have bounties that there is no requirement to ensuring that the code is clean and maintainable for the long term. I for one aren't apposed to bounties given that I've seen in projects mountains of things that have been ignored by the main developers and little interest in fixing them up by those outside the community. NWAM on OpenSolaris being the prime example of something that has been in development for over a year and lags so far behind NetworkManager it is painful.

Reply Parent Score: 2