Linked by Kroc Camen on Thu 4th Jun 2009 22:34 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 367097
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: ..still hating on poor opera?
by MrKane on Fri 5th Jun 2009 12:10
in reply to "RE[2]: ..still hating on poor opera?"
OS X is a better operating system than Windows, again nothing to do with graphics, colours or Photoshop. It’s better designed. From UNIX upwards.
So good that 5% or so of the world uses it. Great....
So what do you think is better? The scheduler? Or is it actually the GUI and not the OS you feel is better for you? Maybe disk access , server scalability or HW support?
Now I know where the article comes from. A deep and good Apple fanboy base.....
RE[4]: ..still hating on poor opera?
by Kroc on Fri 5th Jun 2009 12:22
in reply to "RE[3]: ..still hating on poor opera?"





Member since:
2005-11-10
You must think 'design' means 'photoshop' and nothing else? How pretty it is. It’s nothing of the sort. iPod is no.1 because it works the best, it’s the easiest to use for regular people. Photoshop can’t make a product easy to use.
OS X is a better operating system than Windows, again nothing to do with graphics, colours or Photoshop. It’s better designed. From UNIX upwards.
Opera is badly designed. Throughout. No amount of Photoshopping will make it any more likable to me.