Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 5th Jun 2009 22:20 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 367249
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Waste of time [skeptic]
by Vanders on Sat 6th Jun 2009 09:48
in reply to "RE: Waste of time [skeptic]"
In my experience, projects either come up with something you can "almost" use within 1-2 years or they never do. Examples: Linux (went from 0.01 to v1.0 within a couple of years), FreeDOS. Contra-examples: Hurd, SkyOS, Haiku etc.
How do you know Haiku will never release a working, usable version 1.0?
The reason operating systems take a long time to reach 1.0 is because operating system development is not magic.





Member since:
2006-02-10
Why are they wasting their time doing this project? Really, this is not going anywhere.
I imagine you will be flamed to death for this comment...
Here's a healthy dose of skepticism:
1) Wine has been in development for 16 years. It is useful. It works, but not very well. How much better can we expect ReactOS (which shares a lot of code with Wine anyway) to do? Can ReactOS work better than Linux + Wine? Is kernel compatibility (vs API) the real issue?
2) In my experience, projects either come up with something you can "almost" use within 1-2 years or they never do. Examples: Linux (went from 0.01 to v1.0 within a couple of years), FreeDOS. Contra-examples: Hurd, SkyOS, Haiku etc.
3) ReactOS has been in development for 11 years.