Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 4th Jun 2009 11:12 UTC, submitted by linuxmag
Thread beginning with comment 367374
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2007-03-26
My problem with FAT32 wasn't the patents* (you could use FAT32 patent free if you're happy to loose long filename support and a couple of other work arounds), it's teh fact that it's massively outdated and pretty much an all round crappy FS by todays standards. So Fat16 would only inflame the situation
plus, SSD or not, who actually uses drives smaller than 2GB these days?
* though I did meantion patents in my opening post, it was more in reference to how MS have a vested interest in keeping people locked into FAT32 rather than the patent itself being the FAT32's drawback.