Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 8th Jun 2009 21:24 UTC
SkyOS The future of SkyOS, the closed-source alternative operating system, had been hanging by a thread for a long time now. Barely any releases, until they came to a grinding halt altogether and Robert Szeleney explained he was pondering the future of SkyOS, and where to take it from here. One of the main problems was a lack of driver support which really made development difficult. Well, this is a problem Szeleney might be able to fix.
Thread beginning with comment 367500
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: SkyOS
by Windows Sucks on Mon 8th Jun 2009 23:22 UTC in reply to "SkyOS"
Windows Sucks
Member since:
2005-11-10

So does this mean a Linux/BSD kernel without X.ORG? If yes, that's great! It will be like what Apple did with Mac OS X (except for the command line).


Mac OS doesn't use Linux or BSD kernel though.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: SkyOS
by OSGuy on Tue 9th Jun 2009 00:53 in reply to "RE: SkyOS"
OSGuy Member since:
2006-01-01

Darwin is a BSD kernel used by Mac OS X.

Edited 2009-06-09 00:55 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[3]: SkyOS
by Windows Sucks on Tue 9th Jun 2009 01:11 in reply to "RE[2]: SkyOS"
Windows Sucks Member since:
2005-11-10

Darwin is a BSD kernel used by Mac OS X.


Actually: "Darwin is built around XNU, a hybrid kernel that combines the Mach 3 microkernel, various elements of BSD (including the process model, network stack, and virtual file system)"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_(operating_system)#Kernel

So the Kernel in Darwin is the Mach Microkernel.

Unless you mean BSD as the license, the Mach kernel used in Darrwin and the BSD kernel used in BSD OS's are two different things.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3