Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 8th Jun 2009 21:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 367533
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You should look into Haiku, their goal is to be fully compatible with BeOS R5. I've been testing it for 2 years and it's looking very promising.
http://www.haiku-os.org/about/faq
Edited 2009-06-09 03:35 UTC
As much as I like Unix or Unix-ish operating systems, I really want to be familiar with different non-Unix operating systems besides Windows. SkyOS should be fully open sourced or sell it to a company. I don't want a Unix-ized SkyOS.
Using a minix-clone Kernel won't make SkyOS "unix-y".
People often confuse userland tools with the kernel, but essentially all the kernel is, is an interface to the hardware.
Everything on top of that (from the command line to directory structures to GUI server, etc) are userland tools (in most *nix anyway - some OSs load the GUI server into the kernel).
So ALL SkyOS will be inheriting is driver support for (what you and I know as) SkyOS to talk to the hardware.
Or another way around, bring back the original BeOS for the sake of minimal healthy diversity
BeOS was more "unix-y" than SkyOS is!!!
Edited 2009-06-09 09:06 UTC
People often confuse userland tools with the kernel, but essentially all the kernel is, is an interface to the hardware.
That's the problem. SkyOS and its userland are based on non-Unix dynamics. I don't think superimposing a Unix-ish component is a good idea.
BeOS was more "unix-y" than SkyOS is!!!
So does Amiga and not many people relate BeOS to Unix dynamics.





Member since:
2009-06-09
As much as I like Unix or Unix-ish operating systems, I really want to be familiar with different non-Unix operating systems besides Windows.
SkyOS should be fully open sourced or sell it to a company. I don't want a Unix-ized SkyOS.
Or another way around, bring back the original BeOS for the sake of minimal healthy diversity.