Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 9th Jun 2009 09:34 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 367735
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I have been successful with both yum upgrades and Preupgrade but if you have problems or requests for enhancements then you should be feeding them to bugzilla. Preupgrade itself uses Anaconda and the yum plugins so it does require them. It can clean up after itself, sure. Again, these should go into bugzilla.
Kickstart can always be used for upgrades as well of course.




Member since:
2006-11-23
On small pc park we have a lot of problems with preupgrade and no failure with yum upgrade approach during upgrades from Fedora 9 to 10.
Do you have different experience?
Anaconda (and preupgrade) uses yum underneath and therefore does not download more packages than yum upgrade itself does.
it downloads firstboot, anaconda-yum-plugins and several other useless rpms that it forgets to remove after installation.
If you want to automate upgrades across 50 systems, use kickstart.
I was under impression kickstart is for automating installation (not upgarde process). Can it do upgrades?
Have you tried it yourself?
Thank you for the information.