Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 12th Jun 2009 18:25 UTC
Debian and its clones Well, this is interesting. We already have a Mono item ruffling some feathers on OSNews today, but here we have the apparent news that Tomboy has become a default part of GNOME on Squeeze, the next release of Debian. Wait, what now? Update: I've updated the article with Fedora's position in all this. Read on! Update II: Josselin Mouette replies.
Thread beginning with comment 368275
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Rabble Rabble Rabble
by dgoemans on Fri 12th Jun 2009 19:37 UTC
dgoemans
Member since:
2008-08-23

Flame flame flame. Rabble rabble. Mono Bad. Napster Bad. Rabble rabble rabble.
The mono project is three feet wide and has razor sharp teeth, you really expect me to distribute that?!?!?
Flame.
Rabble.
Lame.
Sigh
:(

Reply Score: -1

RE: Rabble Rabble Rabble
by Novan_Leon on Fri 12th Jun 2009 19:52 in reply to "Rabble Rabble Rabble"
Novan_Leon Member since:
2005-12-07

Welcome to geeks-on-the-internet. ;)

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE: Rabble Rabble Rabble
by pooo on Fri 12th Jun 2009 19:59 in reply to "Rabble Rabble Rabble"
pooo Member since:
2006-04-22

I swear people like you are just sitting in a call center in india getting paid by microsoft to post lame anti-anti-mono crap.

You know, the blog post and everyone in this thread (and in the last mono thread) have been making good reasonable points except for the mono supporters. Only people like you are calling names (without argument) and dismissing the other side without any argument.

So no matter how much you try and paint them as anti-ms zealots, the reality is it isn't the anti-mono group that is acting like irrational zealots, it is the mono fans like you.

Seriously your post is so a-s-s hole-ish and off base. Did you actually read the blog post or any of the comments?? DO YOU EVEN SPEAK ENGLISH?? Or are you just copying and pasting rebuttals from a spreadsheet put together by MS's marketing/psychology department?

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Rabble Rabble Rabble
by pooo on Fri 12th Jun 2009 20:04 in reply to "RE: Rabble Rabble Rabble"
pooo Member since:
2006-04-22

I'll repost an excerpt from my comment in the last thread because it seems even more appropriate here:

Why is it that most "mono haters" present reasoned arguments but mono supporters always reply with personal attacks and condescending dismissals? Not liking what you like doesn't make someone a zealot or a hater. Calling someone that when they've tried to engage in reasonable debate *does* make *you* a zealot and a hater however.

1) Mono "haters" *never* say mono sucks (although they do sometimes say it is slow which is true). They do sometimes ask the question, why do we need mono? For some reason though the reasonable and objective mono fans love to bring this up as if anyone was debating that anyway (this is known as a straw man argument, commonly used by irrational zealots to win arguments when they have no logical basis for their position)

2) Mono "haters" always bring up the fact that MS has patents on large portions of mono that have are *not* under ecma standardization. Reasonable mono fans always reply by saying that that mono is covered by ecma standardization and calling you a zealot (this is known as redirecting the question and not answering the question, also a favorite of zealots with no logical basis for their position)

3) Mono "haters" always bring up the fact that ecma standardization does not preclude MS from chargin RAND fees or requiring licensing. See 2) for response from fans.

I'll add for this particular case:

4) Mono "haters" ask why we need Tomboy when we have gnote that takes almost no space and is not controversial in any way? Mono "fans" reply with "rabble, flame, troll, hate, fud". (This again is known as not answering the question and redirecting the question in the form of character assassination).

Nice.

Reply Parent Score: 7

RE[2]: Rabble Rabble Rabble
by dgoemans on Fri 12th Jun 2009 20:17 in reply to "RE: Rabble Rabble Rabble"
dgoemans Member since:
2008-08-23

Omg that is so racist. I'm actually a game developer and long time linux user who is incredibly sick of pointless anti mono rubbish. But bringing ethnicity into this is really below the belt! I've made my pro mono arguements several times, and I'm over caring. But this kind of flame mongering should be above osnews

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: Rabble Rabble Rabble
by WereCatf on Sat 13th Jun 2009 01:53 in reply to "RE: Rabble Rabble Rabble"
WereCatf Member since:
2006-02-15

Only people like you are calling names
but mono supporters always reply with personal attacks

* swear people like you are just sitting in a call center in india
* it is the mono fans like you.
* Seriously your post is so a-s-s hole-ish
* DO YOU EVEN SPEAK ENGLISH??

Personal attacks: check.
Missing the whole point of the original post: check.
Not a single snide towards anyone in the original post: check.
Make yourself look like a jerk on the internet: check.

I hope you're satisfied with your performance so far ;)

PS. I am against mono and I still think you are the one acting really bad here, not the pro-mono people.

Reply Parent Score: 7

jabbotts Member since:
2007-09-06

Not amused by tech folk discussing teck. No worries, what are the links to your topics of interest so we can all come over there and express not caring about what gets you thinking.

Reply Parent Score: 2