Linked by David Adams on Fri 12th Jun 2009 14:55 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Thread beginning with comment 368331
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-03-24
This "old C" is still very robust in some software engineering, robotics, automation and control systems areas. I can't imagine living without C. Of course it doesn't mean that I use C for all purposes. C is good for some applications just like C# is good for others. There are no universal solutions... And definitely C# and Mono wouldn't be anything universal. Personally, what I like in GNU/Linux is diversity, so why not to have Mono by default? Moreover, it's still a better option than Java in many aspects.
And we shouldn't compare C to C#. It's a better idea to compare C# to Java and CLR to JVM in my opinion.