Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 17th Jun 2009 22:36 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 369222
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-01-15
Aren't the actual Celerons based on the Core Solo CPU, that performs better than a Pentium IV ?
AFAIK there is a 2GHz Celeron now with Conroe-L core that appears to be a one-core-version of the Core Duo.
So I don't understand what the Intel employee says. Enlighten me please.
I would like to substitute the mainboard of my 500 MHz IBM with a new thas this Celeron.