Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 20th Jun 2009 15:57 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 369523
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-06-20
If memory serves right, the EU does not push for having control over the ICANN too, but would prefer a UN oversight, or a merge with the International Telecommunication Union.
The current system is good, but is not robust to a change of heart of the US gov.
The ICANN is a interesting demonstration that a disinterested, private monopolistic organisation can be efficient. It is a thorn in the eye of both liberal economists and state control.