Linked by Kroc Camen on Mon 22nd Jun 2009 12:16 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 369782
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Believe me, I couldn't agree with you more. Considering 90% of our customer base (mechanics and car dealerships worldwide) are using Windows 95/98/2K and have no reason or want to upgrade, I think we'll be safe for a while.
Sometimes it's hard to remember that the whole world isn't on the cutting edge like us programmers :-)
Luckily in Windows 7, there is the 'seamless' Windows XP which can run win16 stuff..
I still use.... QuickC for Windows..
Becuase it's got a good help system, and it's SMALL, only 4 1.44 MB floppies!
I just wish the debugger ran properly, but for that I end up with Virtual PC, MS-DOS 5, Windows 3.0 ....




Member since:
2005-12-04
Unfortunately 16 bit support is reaching the end of the road. XP 64 bit edition dropped support for 16 bit apps; support for 16 bit apps only exists in Vista/Win7 32-bit editions. Note that there is no 32-bit version of Win7 server.
As PCs approach (and exceed) the 4Gb barrier, more OEMs will move to 64-bit editions, and 16 bit support will end with a slow transition.
Unless working in a virtualized environment is suitable for you, 16-bit support is not a good long term choice.