Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 23rd Jun 2009 21:40 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 370013
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-11-02
On a normal monitor, I prefer no anti-aliasing at all. I don't give one bit about font accuracy: when I'm writing documents, it's about the contents, not the looks, and when I'm programming, there's nothing to be printed at all. Same for browsing the web: I almost never print a web page, so who cares that the fonts are 'inaccurate' compared to the printed varieties? Until screens have the same DPI as printers, there's nothing 'accurate' about it anyway, it's just a gross approximation.
On my notebook, I do use anti-aliasing though, as otherwise the lines become so thin I can hardly see them (getting old...).