To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'd like to see an example, I've never seen OO.o handle font display well, http://bayimg.com/MabNhaaCK - but I'm not fussed for free. Printed and pdf output are fine for most uses - though not up to LaTeX standards - I don't use OO.o as a reading environment.
Yeah, and that's in windows where it's using the host glyph renderer, but is ignoring using windows for kerning...
Which is where OoO is REALLY made of /FAIL/ when it comes to working with text... I assume it's the same kerning engine as freetype because if I were to use any other *nix application under X, I get the same oddball kerning errors.
People wonder why I say I can't work with large bodies of text in linux OR OoO - THERE IT IS.
It really seemed fine when I checked but when I did it again it again to take a screenshot it did't look right. I think it was the font size I was using before that made it look ok. I rarely use OO, mostly just to view .doc and .ppt files from google search results so I hadn't noticed it. OO uses its own, apparently defective, private copy of freetype so none of this behavior shows up in any other application on Linux for me. Does anyone know what the issue is with OO's freetype?





Member since:
2005-07-07
I just tried it on my machine (Gentoo, OpenOffice 3.1.0) with all three fonts that you used and it doesn't happen to me. I'm not quite sure what is different but the kerning works fine here.
Edited 2009-06-26 21:36 UTC