Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 28th Jun 2009 17:22 UTC, submitted by Jim Hall
Thread beginning with comment 370674
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-10
What I like on FreeDOS:
- it is small
- it is perfect to learn Assembler. COM-files for example are complete Assemblerbinaries, without EXE-header or so.
- it is the only OpenSource-OperatingSystem I know, which is mature and not a Unix-like System. (Haiku, Syllable and so are comming with Unix-tools and are POSIX-compatible, etc)
- programs on DOS have access to the complete computer. If you write a program for DOS you have not to mind about overlapping windows on your window and redrawing your window and so.
- It is like a bootloader. FreeDOS starts not in RealMode, so it is possible to start any other OperatingSystem from FreeDOS. BeOS for example could be started on Windows95/Windows98 because that reason.
I think there are a lot of more advantages of FreeDOS.
Happy Birthday FreeDOS !