Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 1st Jul 2009 20:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 371199
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Not really - it's just helps to better understand the security issues. Really, I think Windows has a very solid kernel. It's just 2 issues that hold them back:
1. Developers need to adjust their thinking to proper Windows application etiquette. Use the users home profile directory for configuration files, etc. I am a Windows developer and learned this the hard way - my app didn't work in Terminal Server (more of a multi-user environment).
2. Give up endless compatability with the past. Some of the old, poorly written apps are going to have to stop working.
However, your point is valid. I did mean to toot the horn of Unix - its built-in multi-user, networking legacy - more than I wanted to trash Windows. I just bought an upgrade license to Windows 7. It is not my main OS, but I like to keep Windows around.
Now if I could just afford a Mac. That would be way cool!