Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 2nd Jul 2009 18:51 UTC, submitted by snydeq
Internet & Networking We here at OSNews have taken somewhat of an interest in the new HTML5 video and audio tags, which should - some day - make embedding audio and video material into web pages as easy and straightforward as embedding images, allowing the web to finally remove the shackles of dreadful Flash video. Sadly, the problem with these new tags are the codecs; as it turns out, browser makers have not reached an agreement about what codecs to choose for video, with mostly Apple throwing a spanner in the works, and Microsoft shining in absence.
Thread beginning with comment 371400
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Ogg Theora
by Tom K on Thu 2nd Jul 2009 20:44 UTC in reply to "RE: Ogg Theora"
Tom K
Member since:
2005-07-06

Audio codecs and MP3 debates are yesterday's news. Today is all about video codecs.

Know why Vorbis didn't make it? Because iPods and iPhones don't play it. Whine all you like about unfairness and patented algorithms, but that's basically what it comes down to.

Also, people who re-encode their MP3s into Vorbis just to be "free" and/or claim better audio quality COMPLETELY miss the point.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Ogg Theora
by FooBarWidget on Fri 3rd Jul 2009 09:06 in reply to "RE[2]: Ogg Theora"
FooBarWidget Member since:
2005-11-11

Know why Vorbis didn't make it? Because iPods and iPhones don't play it. Whine all you like about unfairness and patented algorithms, but that's basically what it comes down to.


In other words, wide support for a codec is more important than pure quality? Uhm, what was your point about Theora vs H.264 again?

On an unrelated note, I think you have a serious attitude problem towards what you call "freetards". You act as if you have a grudge against them because a horde of "Open Sore Hippies" ate your dog and burned your house. Chill man, nobody here is advocating reencoding their MP3 collection for "freedom".

That said, you are dismissing the whole patent thing as a non-issue and acting as if only losers would complain about it. Imagine if someone charges licensing fees for HTML so that only big and rich companies can afford making websites. Is everybody who wants to make a website but can't because of licensing fees "freetards" or "losers"?

Edited 2009-07-03 09:17 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4