Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 2nd Jul 2009 18:51 UTC, submitted by snydeq
Thread beginning with comment 371450
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Once Youtube works without flash I am purging it
by J. M. on Fri 3rd Jul 2009 03:48
in reply to "RE[2]: Once Youtube works without flash I am purging it"
Uhm... No. Youtube and most flash videos are not in fact Mpeg4, it's On2 Technologies VP6, H.263 or H.264 has been since 2004.
As reported by Media player classic
FLV1 == VP6
FLVC == H.263
The newest iteration supports H.264, and while technically flv supports MP4 (FL4) nobody I'm aware of is actually using it that way.
As reported by Media player classic
FLV1 == VP6
FLVC == H.263
The newest iteration supports H.264, and while technically flv supports MP4 (FL4) nobody I'm aware of is actually using it that way.
Wrong. FLV1 = H.263 (Sorenson Spark). YouTube has always been using H.263 and now it's using H.264. Old videos on YouTube are encoded in FLV/H.263, new videos on YouTube are encoded in H.264, and the container is sometimes FLV (H.264 in FLV is perfectly normal), sometimes MP4.
RE[4]: Once Youtube works without flash I am purging it
by lemur2 on Fri 3rd Jul 2009 04:06
in reply to "RE[3]: Once Youtube works without flash I am purging it"
"Uhm... No. Youtube and most flash videos are not in fact Mpeg4, it's On2 Technologies VP6, H.263 or H.264 has been since 2004. As reported by Media player classic FLV1 == VP6 FLVC == H.263 The newest iteration supports H.264, and while technically flv supports MP4 (FL4) nobody I'm aware of is actually using it that way.
Wrong. FLV1 = H.263 (Sorenson Spark). YouTube has always been using H.263 and now it's using H.264. Old videos on YouTube are encoded in FLV/H.263, new videos on YouTube are encoded in H.264, and the container is sometimes FLV (H.264 in FLV is perfectly normal), sometimes MP4. " AFAIK, only the "watch in HD" streams are encoded in h264. Everything else on YouTube is encoded in either H263 or VP6, both of which are outdone by Theora in its current state of play.
Also, AFAIK, YouTube is actively looking for a more viable solution than H264, because after 2010 it will cost YouTube (as it will anyone else) a small amount of money for every time they send any H264 stream to any recipient.
For a site like YouTube, that could be a lot of transmissions of a lot of videos. Even a small charge for each transmission would end up costing YouTube a fortune by the time it is all added up. This is, AFAIK, exactly why YouTube are looking now to use something else for their codec.
RE[3]: Once Youtube works without flash I am purging it
by memson on Fri 3rd Jul 2009 12:13
in reply to "RE[2]: Once Youtube works without flash I am purging it"
Uhm... No. Youtube and most flash videos are not in fact Mpeg4, it's On2 Technologies VP6, H.263 or H.264 has been since 2004.
As reported by Media player classic
FLV1 == VP6
FLVC == H.263
As reported by Media player classic
FLV1 == VP6
FLVC == H.263
And what people seem to ignore completely is that FLV is a CONTAINER, much like MP4 or AVI. The codec is simply the format of the content of the file. You can implement a video player plugin that handles FLV without going near to Flash... indeed Quicktime, as an example, will happily play FLV files, much like it'll also play 3GP files from my Sony Ericsson mobile phone - so long as it has the codec. VLC is much the same too.







Member since:
2005-07-12
Uhm... No. Youtube and most flash videos are not in fact Mpeg4, it's On2 Technologies VP6, H.263 or H.264 has been since 2004.
As reported by Media player classic
FLV1 == VP6
FLVC == H.263
The newest iteration supports H.264, and while technically flv supports MP4 (FL4) nobody I'm aware of is actually using it that way.
The H.264 support is what really blew people's skirts up lately, since that's HOW YT has implemented that little 'HD' button.
Edited 2009-07-03 00:44 UTC