Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Fri 3rd Jul 2009 20:24 UTC
Internet & Networking Chances are that you've already heard of and even visited Bing, Microsoft's new search offering launched earlier in June, replacing the Live search of yesterday. It's new, shiny, and has pretty pictures, but does it really have much effect on the market? There have been those headlines claiming it's "taken a bite out of Google," but, looking at the statistics, it hasn't really affected the search industry at all.
Thread beginning with comment 371622
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: not yet
by kragil on Fri 3rd Jul 2009 21:06 UTC in reply to "not yet"
kragil
Member since:
2006-01-04

???

They always did that with Live search and MSN and whatever and it has never worked.

So what are you talking about?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE[2]: not yet
by sbergman27 on Fri 3rd Jul 2009 22:12 in reply to "RE: not yet"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

They always did that with Live search and MSN and whatever and it has never worked.

Indeed, you are correct. And when you think about it, with that much of an unfair advantage, its pretty amazing that they have managed to do so poorly for so long. These are the kinds of things I think about when certain blinkered "free enterprise!" people try to tell me that MS has gotten where they are by making better products than their competition. Sometimes their overwhelming desktop monopoly leverage is strong enough to push inferior products into their own monopoly positions. But sometimes the product is *so* inferior that not even overwhelming monopoly leverage is enough to force people to use it.

Edited 2009-07-03 22:16 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE[3]: not yet
by Thom_Holwerda on Fri 3rd Jul 2009 22:18 in reply to "RE[2]: not yet"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

Agreed. Bing just is not as good as Google, not even close. It's like night and day. Fiona and Britney. The Eagles and NSYNC. And so on.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[2]: not yet
by TechGeek on Sat 4th Jul 2009 02:08 in reply to "RE: not yet"
TechGeek Member since:
2006-01-14

kragil and others: Yes, Microsoft to date has had quite crappy search products. The problem is that they dont have to be better than everyone else. They only have to be good enough to not be shunned. Look at IE. Even when it was at its worst, it was still the dominant browser simply because it was the default and most people were unable/too lazy to change. I dont want to see that happen to Google because they actually earned their position.

Edited 2009-07-04 02:09 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[2]: not yet
by arpan on Sat 4th Jul 2009 11:05 in reply to "RE: not yet"
arpan Member since:
2006-07-30

They did get a foothold. They got a 7% or 8% market share. Without IE they would probably have maybe 1% of the market.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1