Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 4th Jul 2009 00:40 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 371684
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Excellent, now you can satisfy your OS X envy, T
by Bobthearch on Sat 4th Jul 2009 04:04
in reply to "RE[6]: Excellent, now you can satisfy your OS X envy, T"
RE[8]: Excellent, now you can satisfy your OS X envy, T
by middleware on Sat 4th Jul 2009 04:11
in reply to "RE[7]: Excellent, now you can satisfy your OS X envy, T"
RE[7]: Excellent, now you can satisfy your OS X envy, T
by Tuishimi on Sat 4th Jul 2009 23:05
in reply to "RE[6]: Excellent, now you can satisfy your OS X envy, T"
Your metaphors need a little work. Hitler? Spare auto parts?
I am running OS X on a home-built PC right now. It smokes (quad core, 8 gigs of ram, ICH10, 2.5 Terabytes of disk space, 9800 GTX+... All for 1,000 USD. On the other hand, I do have a house full of Macs (wife, and kids have them)... I always buy the family pack of OS X, iWork and iLife whenever a new version is released.
I do not expect Apple to offer ANY support for my PC, and if it comes to the point where Mac OS X won't upgrade on my machine then, oh well, I either stay where I am or move to Linux or Windows 7. My problem.




Member since:
2006-05-11
Because it is pointless to say Apple sell OS X alone while someone says Apple set hardware and software as a set. Selling OS X alone like selling spare parts and that's not the essence of the business model. If you mix any single channel you can get something with the essence of the business model in the reasoning, you will get no conclusion meaningful.
So as you said, they don't and don't expect support, and Apple set H/S as a set.