Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 4th Jul 2009 00:40 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 371818
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by mynameisnobody
by testman on Sun 5th Jul 2009 12:10
in reply to "RE: Comment by mynameisnobody"
That's okay. Nothing forces Apple to sell copies (!) to HP or Dell. But apparently, Psistar and PearC are still able to buy copies.
That is fine, however:
But there is also really no law that forbids them to install PC's with those copies.
…and yet it is in the courts as we speak.
RE[3]: Comment by mynameisnobody
by dmantione on Sun 5th Jul 2009 12:43
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by mynameisnobody"
…and yet it is in the courts as we speak.
The PearC is not in courts and the legality of its business has until now not been disputed by Apple.
This is indeed unlike the Psystar case, but nobody has denied that the U.S. situation is different, the law system is totally different there.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Ask DELL or HP which OS they'd rather pre-install on their PCs. OSX of course.
Why don't they? BECAUSE APPLE REFUSES TO SELL THEM LICENSES
That's okay. Nothing forces Apple to sell copies (!) to HP or Dell. But apparently, Psistar and PearC are still able to buy copies. But there is also really no law that forbids them to install PC's with those copies.