Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 5th Jul 2009 22:03 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes Time for another Week in Review. We had a fairly regular week this week, with the focus somehow being Mac cloners, The Pirate Bay, Mono, and Browsers were also in the spotlight this week with the release of Firefox 3.5, disagreements on the video tag codec, and talking about KHTML.
Thread beginning with comment 371865
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: HTML and APple
by merlin747 on Mon 6th Jul 2009 02:25 UTC in reply to "HTML and APple"
merlin747
Member since:
2006-11-09

Whether Apple supported ogg wouldn't matter, if IE would suddenly support ogg. You bet Apple would follow suit and implement it, if that happened, they can't be left behind. So please do keep things in relation here.


He can't help it... he's the equivalent of Fox News in the United States... completely off-base.

Chances of Microsoft actually supporting an open codec is less than that of an unbiased opinion from some of the folks who frequent this site. (read: Microsoft would never support a non-Microsoft technology even if it would improve interoperability... remember their implementation of their own PDF-killer?)

Kelly

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 0

RE[2]: HTML and APple
by Thom_Holwerda on Mon 6th Jul 2009 03:29 in reply to "RE: HTML and APple"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

You don't know your history.

*Adobe* prevented Microsoft from including PDF in Office, as Adobe did not want Microsoft to provide said feature for free.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[3]: HTML and APple
by merlin747 on Mon 6th Jul 2009 11:48 in reply to "RE[2]: HTML and APple"
merlin747 Member since:
2006-11-09

You don't know your history.

*Adobe* prevented Microsoft from including PDF in Office, as Adobe did not want Microsoft to provide said feature for free.


Kinda funny isn't it? I mean, the MS Office with PDF creation would certainly challenge Adobe's product. But rather than pay the licensing fee (which Microsoft demands of all using their codecs and components) they chose to create a completely useless technology. Well, I guess it's not useless if you're one of the masses... but having someone send me a MDI file when I was living Ubuntu was frustrating.

Just so I can clarify it: you feel that all software should be free of cost and we shouldn't have to pay for what we want to use. Does that sum it up, Thom?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1