Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 6th Jul 2009 22:03 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 372037
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Uncompetitive competition
by bousozoku on Wed 8th Jul 2009 03:44
in reply to "RE[3]: Uncompetitive competition"
...
What the US needs is four operators who operate nation wide networks (not just regional) so that there is real competition rather than just regionally based monopolies. Leadership won't be taken because I only need to look at some of the Nobel prize winners that exist in the congress and senate from both parties - its little wonder as to why the US is in the mess it is in today.
AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, T-Mobile: they're all national operators, even though they don't all cover a lot of space in a country that I found to be about 4000 km wide. AT&T and Verizon are both made of different parts of the original AT&T that was broken by the government way back when. They just haven't got away from their 1950s way of doing business.
I mean, honestly, Rick Santorum - in any other country would a senator be voted in who had a fetish to constantly talk about homosexuality and sexual acts? These are the types of idiots that exist in the US who are being voted in - in any other country they would be relegated to the lowest position on the list mp selection and kept at the back - far out of sight from the public.
...
I saw Rick Santorum before he was a senator, when he appeared with Teresa Heinz (now Teresa Kerry) to take over her dead husband's seat and he appeared to be more in touch with what Americans wanted. Two years later, he did a 180 degree turn and he was way off centre.




Member since:
2005-07-06
Unfortunately what happens it there is massive fracturing in the market - of the 1.2trillion that was spent, what the US government could have done was provided low interest loans (interest at the rate of inflation) or allow investments into infrastructure to be written off against not only present and future tax payments but also past tax payments.
What the US needs is four operators who operate nation wide networks (not just regional) so that there is real competition rather than just regionally based monopolies. Leadership won't be taken because I only need to look at some of the Nobel prize winners that exist in the congress and senate from both parties - its little wonder as to why the US is in the mess it is in today.
I mean, honestly, Rick Santorum - in any other country would a senator be voted in who had a fetish to constantly talk about homosexuality and sexual acts? These are the types of idiots that exist in the US who are being voted in - in any other country they would be relegated to the lowest position on the list mp selection and kept at the back - far out of sight from the public.
For 8 years I saw the US consumed by the debate over gay marriage - the economy is going to hell in a hand basket, the infrastructure is falling to pieces before your eyes and your telecommunications infrastructure is a joke which makes many developing economies look futuristic. All those problems but apparently gay marriage, something that effects less than 10% of the population is the all consuming issue of the United States.
Congratulations, that is why the US the way it is; trivial sh*t consuming the air waves, political debates and policy decisions rather than long term policies that focus the energies of a nation in a given direction.
Edited 2009-07-07 09:49 UTC