Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Wed 8th Jul 2009 18:34 UTC, submitted by rlem6983
Google Google's recent move of revealing the Chrome OS to a suspecting public has put a great many people on alert. Some say it's a major privacy issue, some say Google oughtn't to become more and more monopolistic, while others think that the wide array of popular Linux distributions shouldn't become even more fragmented than it already is. "Google's decision to create its own Linux distribution and splinter the Linux community decisively once again can only be seen as foolhardy and self-obsessive. Instead of treading its own path, Google should have sought to leverage the stellar work already carried out by Mark Shuttleworth and his band of merry coders and tied its horse to the Ubuntu cart."
Thread beginning with comment 372448
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: No thanks Ubuntu.
by Teknoenie on Thu 9th Jul 2009 06:16 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: No thanks Ubuntu."
Teknoenie
Member since:
2007-06-07

"For the sake of argument, let's pretend that I believe that you really maintain 7000 hosts in the enterprise."

Thank you for understanding, and yes I do. GNU/Linux CentOS, Ubuntu and SLES at a major university.

"Is your post somehow supposed to be relevant to the topic at hand?"

Yes, it's that Ubuntu, while a great OS, is not the pancea that people make it out to be.

"session that you are simply casting about for anything you can blather in disparagement of a distro which, I suppose, you feel threatens your favored distro."

Hahaha, I could care less. I use Ubuntu on my desktop and laptop. Why, because I'm lazy, but on the other hand I can also use LFS and know GNU/Linux, BSD and UNIX pretty darn well. I use CentOS/RHEL/Suse at work on the desktop and in our HPC installation. I've used most variations of GNU/Linux, BSD and UNIX since 1993, so no, it doesn't threaten my favorite distro. More or less I'm pointing out that Ubuntu isn't all that great.

"You do realize that we're talking about an OS configuration which is going to be rolled out preinstalled on netbook *clients*, and later, desktop *clients*. And not about rolling this out on preexisting hardware at Google and Yahoo. Did you even read the article?"

Again, a general comment towards Ubuntu and not this product at hand. Yes, I read the article, I understand where this is going to be deployed, but again, why does it have to have *anything* to do with Ubuntu. If it wasn't for Debian Ubuntu wouldn't even exist unless Shuttleworth decided to use a different distribution and build from there! Oh wait, that's what Google is doing! Screw Ubuntu it doesn't matter!

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[8]: No thanks Ubuntu.
by Fergy on Thu 9th Jul 2009 07:59 in reply to "RE[7]: No thanks Ubuntu."
Fergy Member since:
2006-04-10

I use Ubuntu on my desktop and laptop. Why, because I'm lazy, but on the other hand I can also use LFS and know GNU/Linux, BSD and UNIX pretty darn well.

You are implying that you can get the same easy to use results that Ubuntu provides without using those evil binary blobs. I'm sure that if there was a good opensource replacement for those blobs that Ubuntu would love to use those instead.

Do you know something that other people don't?

The reason I like Ubuntu is because they make a usable desktop OS without me having to hunt for scripts to fix all the flaws I see in(for example) Fedora.

Reply Parent Score: 1