Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 27th Sep 2005 22:40 UTC, submitted by Danijel Orsolic
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu "This follow-up to the previously published article 'Ubuntu: Derivative or Fork?' takes into account most of everything that has been posted as a reaction to the first article to present a general opinion and compare them with facts derived from various resouces. You'll see that peace can be achieved between these two, and ultimately any GNU/Linux group out there."
Thread beginning with comment 37257
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Anonymous Penguin
Member since:
2005-07-06

"Linspire, for instance, releases a big ISO of source code at every new release, with no disclosure beforehand."

We can't really put Linspire into the equation, although I must say that once I dist-upgrade Linspire 5.0 to Sid and I didn't break anything.

For everything else they have done for the poor and the Open Source community, kudos to them, I try to be a fair man.

Reply Parent Score: 0

Anonymous Penguin Member since:
2005-07-06

I don't understand why my post was modded down. Maybe because my last sentence wasn't clear enough:

"For everything else they have done for the poor and the Open Source community, kudos to them, I try to be a fair man."

"They" I mean Canonical, not Linspire.

Reply Parent Score: 1