Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 9th Jul 2009 21:43 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 372818
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: again, my concern is for the - missleading?
by Adurbe on Fri 10th Jul 2009 20:56
in reply to "RE: again, my concern is for the - missleading?"
RE[3]: again, my - not caused by the retailer
by jabbotts on Sat 11th Jul 2009 13:51
in reply to "RE[2]: again, my concern is for the - missleading?"
There's no license for stupid. The retailer can only do so much and provided they have shown due diligence in notifying the customer, what more can they do? Even laws can't protect people from themselves so at some point, the consumer hast to take some responsibility for there choices.






Member since:
2007-09-06
Customers not reading the documentation is far different from a company intentionally misleading them in a case of false advertisement. So far, it seems pretty clear that it's not Apple hardware they are selling though. Where I buying, I'd be confirming how they support updates and upgrades but I'd do that for any software.