Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 9th Jul 2009 12:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 372947
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: What an utter non-issue
by dylansmrjones on Sun 12th Jul 2009 13:56
in reply to "RE[6]: What an utter non-issue"
RE[7]: What an utter non-issue
by Vanders on Sun 12th Jul 2009 23:53
in reply to "RE[6]: What an utter non-issue"
RE[8]: What an utter non-issue
by boldingd on Mon 13th Jul 2009 19:47
in reply to "RE[7]: What an utter non-issue"
Speaking for myself, it doesn't sound odd, it sounds stilted: it sounds like someone is speaking in a slightly-less-than-natural manner in a conscious effort to be more politically correct. Using "they" as a gender-neutral pronoun is about like saying "one" or "oneself" to avoid using "you" in formal writing.




Member since:
2005-11-11
Agreed, but you'll get people saying that by using "he" to mean "he or she" you are perpetuating male domination through language patterns or something.

A gender neutral singular pronoun would not go amiss*. But please not, as the OP accused the Brits of using, "they". FFS.
*german has one. Ironically, it is "man". This is not the same word as "Mann" though