Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 15th Jul 2009 16:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 373477
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: What's wrong with a reboot?
by Lennie on Thu 16th Jul 2009 00:31
in reply to "RE: What's wrong with a reboot?"
Because some things are really hard (or just expensive) to be able to complete failover for, like Linux with specific hardware for running telephony systems.
Even 0.02 cents per machine could be to expensive if their are a lot of machines. For example it would be really nice if the update of your cable-modem didn't disconnect you from internet for a couple of minutes.
For some things it's just easier on the administrative side, like the cluster running calculations where you don't want to move jobs around and rebooting cluster-nodes that haven't been rebooted and then moving the jobs back and rebooting other nodes and keeping track of which you have and haven't had.
Their could be many reasons. :-)




Member since:
2007-08-12
That is correct. What kind of service is so important that it needs to be always up, yet not important enough to justify a failover scheme?
Projects like this are nice, of course. But they aren't practical at all.