Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Jul 2009 19:16 UTC
Sun Solaris, OpenSolaris The Linux desktop has come a long way. It's a fully usable, stable, and secure operating system that can be used quite easily by the masses. Not too long ago, Sun figured they could do the same by starting Project Indiana, which is supposed to deliver a complete distribution of OpenSolaris in a manner similar to GNU/Linux. After using the latest version for a while, I'm wondering: why?
Thread beginning with comment 374228
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Something is missing
by massysett on Mon 20th Jul 2009 20:23 UTC
massysett
Member since:
2007-12-04

If OpenSolaris is a Linux distribution, then isn't it missing...um...Linux?

Reply Score: 5

RE: Something is missing
by oxygene on Mon 20th Jul 2009 20:36 in reply to "Something is missing"
oxygene Member since:
2005-07-07

If OpenSolaris is a Linux distribution, then isn't it missing...um...Linux?

As long as you're talking about Linux-the-kernel, yes.

Now, let's talk about Linux-the-distro. It's usually Linux, glibc, X11, {kde,gnome,xfce,lxde}, more apps, some random packaging horror and a custom theme to make you feel at home at the developer HQ.

OpenSolaris replaces Linux and glibc with its own counterparts, but the other stuff is there. From a user perspective (Kernel and libc are really not that interesting for users), it's the same.

Reply Parent Score: 2