Linked by David Adams on Mon 20th Jul 2009 23:13 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 374294
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I preferred Dokuwiki over MediaWiki, not sure why. Quite easy to setup and use. Also relies on text files for storage instead of a database.
It also might have less features that MediaWiki though.
It also might have less features that MediaWiki though.
Doku has a nice selection of plugins available for it, and they're easy to install. All in all, it's a good package that doesn't require the overhead MediaWiki has.
I've been meaning to try out DokuWiki, as I've heard great things about it... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_wiki_software
FWIW, I was able to install DokuWiki and serve it from an extremely low-resource server. From memory, all that it required was the Cherokee web server and the DokuWiki php code.
I didn't have an actual use for its capabilities, so I took it down.
I am currently running CMSimple instead, which is even lighter and even less capability, but it is all that I need.
I just set DokuWiki up last week for a small business, after looking at a half dozen options.
The template choices can really alter the appearance and functionality to your needs, and if you want to spend the time to mod one, you can get quite custom.
The data is all stored in text files, simple to backup and move. For this case, I used WAMPServer and just added it to one of their underutilized Win server boxes.
The thing is so lightweight, you could probably serve it from a Linux stamp, though. If you wanted.
If you don't want to config WAMPServer, I do like the Turnkey Linux appliances, their LAMP server makes a great VM with low resource use (disk, ram).




Member since:
2006-01-26
I've been meaning to try out DokuWiki, as I've heard great things about it...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_wiki_software