Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Jul 2009 19:16 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 374373
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"We're comparing OpenSolaris here, not Solaris. OpenSolaris should install in 15 minutes or less. So your comment and experience don't quite apply."
BinaryCrusader (what an odd pseudonym), you ought to read the posts before you dive off into commenting. There is a short initial sentence followed by a second sentence that shows (or tried to show) my original good feelings towards Solaris and hence Open Solaris. These original good feelings were then changed by the Open Solaris experience.
I'm sorry if that is too difficult to understand.
The world would be a nicer place if we occasionally thought first and then acted; don't you agree?
Regards,
Peter




Member since:
2005-07-06
I tried it when it was first released. In my working days, Solaris was an OS that was held in the same esteem as IBM's MVS and VM (much better than DEC's VAX/VMS (I think it was called; the forerunner to Microsoft's Windows NT :-)) - that will get some negative comment). So I was keen to try it on my PC desktop. I agree with your findings, Solaris took hours to install but only minutes to replace (with Ubuntu).
Can I suggest that you try PC-BSD, it seems to be a very robust desktop OS and has, IMHO, the best package manager there is.
Regards,
Peter
We're comparing OpenSolaris here, not Solaris. OpenSolaris should install in 15 minutes or less. So your comment and experience don't quite apply.