Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Jul 2009 22:53 UTC, submitted by Remy Chi Jian Suen
Editorial So, Microsoft submits 20000 lines of code to the Linux kernel, all licensed under the GPL. Microsoft, who considers Linux a great threat, and once called the GPL a "cancer". Opinions on this one are flying all around us, but what does Linus Torvalds, Linux' benevolent dictator, think about all this?
Thread beginning with comment 374939
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: I agree...
by drstorm on Thu 23rd Jul 2009 23:31 UTC in reply to "I agree..."
drstorm
Member since:
2009-04-24

I agree, too. I like when people are being realistic.
Stallman is a bit mad, I think.

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[2]: I agree...
by J.R. on Fri 24th Jul 2009 00:25 in reply to "RE: I agree..."
J.R. Member since:
2007-07-25

I agree, too. I like when people are being realistic.
Stallman is a bit mad, I think.


I agree as well. One thing is being skeptical, but when certain people need to bash Microsoft at any cost it makes the entire community and culture look less serious, which is bad for Linux. Truth is that many of the most vocal Linux supporters keep focusing on the negative of Microsoft rather than the positive of Linux. I think people that consider switching to Linux need to see that its an inclusive culture built on positive values, rather than a culture built on hate.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[3]: I agree...
by lemur2 on Fri 24th Jul 2009 00:42 in reply to "RE[2]: I agree..."
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

"I agree, too. I like when people are being realistic. Stallman is a bit mad, I think.
I agree as well. One thing is being skeptical, but when certain people need to bash Microsoft at any cost it makes the entire community and culture look less serious, which is bad for Linux. Truth is that many of the most vocal Linux supporters keep focusing on the negative of Microsoft rather than the positive of Linux. I think people that consider switching to Linux need to see that its an inclusive culture built on positive values, rather than a culture built on hate. "

I think you may find that the hate is coming from the Microsoft side of the fence.

Microsoft and its followers hate FOSS (Freedom Open Source Software). They have stated this openly, many times. They attack it constantly. Typical language Microsoft has used to describe FOSS in the past include terms like "cancer", "virus", "un-American", "communist" and "destroyer of IP" (as if FOSS somehow cannot have IP of its own). FUD and misinformation about FOSS floods the internet and much of the mass media. Microsoft are trying to turn the word "collaboration" into a dirty word.

Truth is that many of the most vocal Microsoft supporters keep focusing on trying to allege negatives of Linux, or simply making stuff up, rather than the positives of Microsoft software. Typically, if you do hear a rant from a FOSS supporter, it will be a reaction to this.

The need to do this (spread disinformation and negative vibes about Linux) is due to the fact that, from a consumers point of view, there are no positives of Microsoft software (relative to FOSS software).

Edited 2009-07-24 00:55 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 11