Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Jul 2009 22:53 UTC, submitted by Remy Chi Jian Suen
Thread beginning with comment 374968
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Embrace Extend Extinguish
by lemur2 on Fri 24th Jul 2009 02:05
in reply to "RE[3]: Embrace Extend Extinguish"
RE[5]: Embrace Extend Extinguish
by Hiev on Fri 24th Jul 2009 02:09
in reply to "RE[4]: Embrace Extend Extinguish"
RE[5]: Embrace Extend Extinguish
by stone on Fri 24th Jul 2009 07:07
in reply to "RE[4]: Embrace Extend Extinguish"
You are getting it all wrong.
Microsoft is the source of the hate, not its object.
Microsoft is the source of the hate, not its object.
you need to take a good look at yourself. you are the personification of fanaticism, hatred and trench digging. thank you for making a good example as to why linus wouldn't want to identify himself nor his software with people like you.
RE[4]: Embrace Extend Extinguish - have a link or title
by jabbotts on Fri 24th Jul 2009 14:15
in reply to "RE[3]: Embrace Extend Extinguish"
RE[4]: Embrace Extend Extinguish
by bnolsen on Sat 25th Jul 2009 13:41
in reply to "RE[3]: Embrace Extend Extinguish"
IBM lost their monopoly status.
Nothing wrong with having a monopoly.
Problems occur when a company has a monopoly position and abuses that position to try to wipe out competitors and strong arm partners.
When referring to MS please put these two together: "abuse of their monopoly position". It actually accurately describes the conviction and situation.
Edited 2009-07-25 13:42 UTC





Member since:
2005-09-27
IBM changed?
Just search for google for their latest unetique behavior, it was a few months ago.
But MS is the horse to beat, right?