Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Jul 2009 19:16 UTC
Sun Solaris, OpenSolaris The Linux desktop has come a long way. It's a fully usable, stable, and secure operating system that can be used quite easily by the masses. Not too long ago, Sun figured they could do the same by starting Project Indiana, which is supposed to deliver a complete distribution of OpenSolaris in a manner similar to GNU/Linux. After using the latest version for a while, I'm wondering: why?
Thread beginning with comment 375090
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: WTF???
by dvzt on Fri 24th Jul 2009 17:43 UTC in reply to "WTF???"
Member since:

The author then moves on to the usual OpenSolaris complaints about the lack of software in the repositories. Again no specifics as to what is missing in the way of software. For that matter why doesn’t the author take the time to compile the software he wants himself? I have asked this question before and was shouted down for even suggesting such a thing. For that matter why doesn’t the author or the other people who complain stand up and say “I will contribute to the effort and compile “enter software title here” and put it in the repository”? It is easy to complain, but not so easy to do something. How much of a geek are you if you can’t compile your own software?

You can try it yourself, but you'll see that a lot of common open source software either won't compile on (Open)Solaris at all, or it will require a lot of effort to make it compile. Why? Because most of OSS was developed on Linux, which is *not* fully POSIX compliant, even if Linux folks like to claim it is.

What user experience? Again no real frame of reference other than mentioning the user experience is better using Fedora, OpenSUSE and Ubuntu.

OpenSolaris' main goal insn't about user experience, Thom just doesn't (want to) realise that.

Why was this published in the first place?

Here's why:

Because of lower incomes, OS news authors are resorting to very poor flame-bait articles (and other crap). They have zero value, but guarantee a few more ad viewers.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: WTF???
by Robert Escue on Fri 24th Jul 2009 18:04 in reply to "RE: WTF???"
Robert Escue Member since:

I wrote an article for OSNews on OpenSolaris and used iozone to gather benchmarks on ZFS and did this without incident, the same way I did it with Solaris from 7 through 10. I think the problem for most Linux users trying to do things on OpenSolaris is that they have no idea how Solaris and OpenSolaris works. From simple things like adding /usr/sfw/bin to your PATH statement to using crle to update your dynamic linking environment, if it doesn't work it is much easier to complain than it is to actually learn how to use it. And just because it doesn't work exactly like Linux doesn't cut it for me as an answer. I don't have the luxury of walking around with blinders and see only "Linux". If the people I work for want AIX or HP-UX, I can't say "Well I only know this ..." and expect to continue to be employed.

That does not mean I totally disagree with you, I have found several pieces of software that just plain doesn't compile on Solaris and would probably fail in the same fashion on OpenSolaris like Nagios and OpenLDAP. I'll have to give it a try on my "slow" (Pentium IV) OpenSolaris machine at home just for laughs.

If the OSNews staff would get some real content and kick the trolls out, I don't think they would have a money problem.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: WTF???
by dvzt on Fri 24th Jul 2009 21:54 in reply to "RE[2]: WTF???"
dvzt Member since:

Just two quick notes:
- crle is deprecated, prefered way to configure locations of libraries is LD_LIBRARY_PATH,
- you can get binary packages of nagions and openldap for (Open)Solaris from blastwave.

Reply Parent Score: 1