Linked by Eugenia Loli on Fri 24th Jul 2009 22:52 UTC
Editorial Every few years we geeks have our own kind of popcorn show to watch: tech companies showing teeth to one another. This time around, it's Palm vs Apple. In all seriousness though, how ethical is the battle around iTunes?
Thread beginning with comment 375178
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Ethics
by Hakime on Sat 25th Jul 2009 05:35 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Ethics"
Member since:


I said you that Palm has an vendor ID, what this story logo? Did you ever see an USB logo on an ipod?

Anyway without it, no Product ID, so it can't sync with iTunes as it first checks for the product ID. So what the point for Palm?

Edited 2009-07-25 05:39 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[6]: Ethics
by David on Sat 25th Jul 2009 06:25 in reply to "RE[5]: Ethics"
David Member since:

But who gave Palm the vendorID? I believe that it was the USB Implementers Forum that hands out the Product IDs. Just because Apple uses the vendorID to tell what's an Apple iPod and what isn't, doesn't mean that Palm ever made any agreement with Apple to only identify its devices as Palm devices. Palm made that agreement with the USB Implementers Forum. And what I'm wondering is whether Palm can just back out of that agreement. Apple doesn't have anything to do with Palm's relationship with USB Implementers Forum.

Reply Parent Score: 1