Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th Jul 2005 14:00 UTC, submitted by Timothy R. Butler
GNU, GPL, Open Source Tim Butler knew when he mentioned something negative about the GNU Project's General Public License (GPL), in his column on KDE last week, he would inevitably be accused of arguing the GPL was a bad license. What did not fit into that piece shall now be dealt with: is the GPL a bad license or is the issue he complained about something else?
Thread beginning with comment 3752
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Untruths, one after another.
by Morty on Wed 13th Jul 2005 18:24 UTC in reply to "RE: Untruths, one after another."
Morty
Member since:
2005-07-06

This is really a red herring.

No It's not, as you clearly do not base the discussion on the value of different licenses even if you try to make it sound so. Your last arguent made it more than clear, the base of your argumnet are nothing but price. It's only haggling.

Reply Parent Score: 1

tbutler Member since:
2005-07-06

No, it just shows I can support my argument from multiple directions that are all interconnected.

Reply Parent Score: 1