Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 28th Jul 2009 22:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 375951
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by Moulinneuf
by Adam S on Wed 29th Jul 2009 15:01
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Moulinneuf"
RE[6]: Comment by Moulinneuf
by middleware on Wed 29th Jul 2009 15:07
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Moulinneuf"
The reason you think Apple can't do that is still you don't like that, because there is no case to say Apple can't. When you buy a disc of music, you mustn't play it publicly. When you buy a book, you mustn't OCR it and put it on the Web. We live such restriction everywhere and won't change it in the near future.





Member since:
2006-05-11
Maybe, probably it is still legal because no explicit case says otherwise. All the past cases are different from Apple vs. Psystar cases. For example, in the Adobe vs. SoftMan case, the software was not installed. EULA is still the base of software commerce and it is risky to think certain kind of restriction in it is invalid just because you don't like it.