Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Jul 2009 17:10 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 375996
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Any Reason other than That?
by tyrione on Wed 29th Jul 2009 18:19
in reply to "Any Reason other than That?"
RE[2]: Any Reason other than That?
by darknexus on Wed 29th Jul 2009 18:26
in reply to "RE: Any Reason other than That?"
EFF would stop making that broad stroke if Linux were the prevailing market leader.
Why do you keep bringing Linux into this discussion? I've not seen one mention of Linux outside of your comments. I do have to hand it to you though, there's no faster way to send a discussion spiraling off topic around here than to pull Linux into it somehow.
RE[2]: Any Reason other than That?
by segedunum on Thu 30th Jul 2009 00:12
in reply to "RE: Any Reason other than That?"
EFF would stop making that broad stroke if Linux were the prevailing market leader.
Since Linux and the software that surrounds it is open source and de facto open anyway then creating a closed platform with it like Apple is going would be that much more difficult. I fail to see how you can compare apples to kiwi fruits, so to speak, in the EFF's reasoning.
I recommend a cold shower otherwise your head is going to explode.




Member since:
2006-05-11
Technical considerations aside, the EFF has argued that Apple's lock on the iPhone is unmerited from a copyright protection perspective and aims to "suppress competition from independent iPhone application vendors."
For a product possessing less than 5%, do they have to relate every argue with monopoly? I don't see any reason, for which people have to be locked on iPhone, similar to why people had to be locked on Office or IE. Actually if Apple want to make its phone product close AND attractive, they do need to make it much better than other vendors' by their own. Don't see any hurt to competition.