Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 27th Jul 2009 07:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 376142
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-05
When the EC says that it's not sufficient to restore competition, that's because they don't find it to be sufficient to restore competition. Even a dishonest Microsoft shill would understand that.
Of course Microsoft will be fined if it ignores the EC verdict!
The bottom line is that the EC did not think removing IE was an appropriate remedy. Simple as that.
The VIOLATOR doesn't get to decide his own punishment, you know.
Now you are getting all confused again. Microsoft did break the law, as is clear from the facts. And the proposed measures are neither extreme nor stupid. Only a brainwashed MS shill would claim otherwise.
The EC actually does something, unlike the fascists who turned the case on its head in the US because a new president inserted fascists who preferred to reward anti-competitive behavior.
The EC does it properly. It looks at the facts, and comes to a verdict. You are just dishonestly trying to spread FUD about the EU because of your fascist leanings.
It is clear that Microsoft broke the law. Unless you are a dishonest or ignorant MS shill, of course.
Edited 2009-07-30 17:21 UTC