Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 31st Jul 2009 15:46 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 376368
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Kokopelli
by Thom_Holwerda on Fri 31st Jul 2009 17:11
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Kokopelli"
RE[4]: Comment by Kokopelli
by Kokopelli on Fri 31st Jul 2009 17:26
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Kokopelli"
So the fact the they went through Swedish authorities, the Swedish baliff, as well as a known good email address was not important? The fact that when the official channels were tried and failed that Twitter and facebook were used as well is the critical piece of information? The fact that the registered mail was signed for is not pertinent? And the fact that the link sent in the summons was visited by an address that resolves to a pirate bay owned address is not important either? If you are going to report report the whole story, not just the parts you want.
I am simply asking that you report all of the facts rather than cherry picking the ones you like. I would expect that from torrentfreak but not osnews.






Member since:
2005-07-06
I did, did you?
You seem to have left a good chunk off. biased it is.